Summary of Investigation – Portland PR Limited
Monday 11th January 2021
Organisation or Person Investigated
Portland PR Limited
Whether Portland PR Limited submitted accurate QIRs, particularly
non-inclusion of Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in their QIR for April to June 2020; and whether George Pascoe-Watson’s discussions with Lord Bethell included undeclared lobbying. This investigation followed a Sunday Times article on 15 November 2020.
The QIR for April to June 2020 is accurate, based on assurances
from Portland PR Limited and further enquiries with the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). However, in reviewing all QIR data, Portland PR Limited discovered that clients were omitted from their July to September 2020 QIR, for which I will issue a Notice of Intention to impose a civil penalty.
Summary of Rationale for Decision
On the two specific questions, assurances have been given by Portland PR: that they had no involvement in the meeting with Lord O’Shaughnessy, DHSC and BCG; nor were they connected with Mr Pascoe’s-Watson’s role at DHSC. I accept the evidence and assurances given, that both were acting in an independent capacity. As part of Portland PR Limited’s full review, they have declared omitted clients from their July to September 2020 QIR. A civil penalty is appropriate for this omission.
|15 November 2020||Sunday Times article regarding potential undeclared lobbying.|
|16 November 2020||Formal letter from Registrar to Portland PR Limited regarding|
accuracy of QIRs, particularly non-inclusion of Boston
Consulting Group (BCG) in their QIR for April to June 2020;
and whether George Pascoe-Watson’s discussions with Lord
Bethell included undeclared lobbying. Response required by 17:00 on 23 November.
|23 November 2020||Letter from Portland PR Limited, stating they need more time|
to review all QIRs for comprehensive assurance.
|24 November 2020||Letter from Registrar to Portland PR Limited extending|
deadline for full response to 1 December 17:00.
|1 December 2020 ||Letter from Portland PR Limited requesting further time|
to complete the process of QIR verification for
|4 December 2020||Email from ORCL office requiring response to the two|
specific issues raised in the Registrar’s letter of 16
November by 17:00; and the fuller response by 17:00 on
|4 December 2020||Call and email from Portland PR Limited apologising for|
delay; confirming discrepancies in their QIR July to
September 2020; confirming no consultant lobbying for
BCG in April to June 2020; and Mr Pascoe’s-Watson’s
role at DHSC was in a personal capacity and did not
involve lobbying for Portland PR Limited clients.
|7 December 2020||Email from ORCL office for further clarification on dates|
of meetings with Lord O’Shaughnessy, DHSC and BCG
and who initiated.
|8 December 2020||Email from Portland PR Limited confirming no|
involvement with the meeting and suggesting follow up
|14 December 2020||Formal letter from Registrar to DHSC, requesting further|
information about meetings with Lord O’Shaughnessy,
DHSC and BCG and who initiated.
|15 December 2020||Full response from Portland PR Limited, confirming|
response of 4 December; identifying and apologising for
three omitted clients from the July to September 2020
return, following a full review; and providing assurance
that this was not as a result of a systems issue.
|16 December 2020 ||Email from ORCL office requesting further information|
on reason for omissions and basis for assurance that it’s
|18 December 2020||Email from Portland PR Limited, giving further|
information on reporting systems and omission.
|23 December 2020||Email from DHSC, confirming no involvement from|
Portland PR Limited in meeting with Lord
O’Shaughnessy, DHSC and BCG.
11 January 2021
Office of the Registrar of Consultant Lobbyists